A
solution to violence is in our hands
We'd judge others less harshly if we knew more about the cerebral cortex DR.
GABOR MATÉ
Wednesday, August 2, 2000
Last week the journal Science reported that in people prone to violence, the portion of
the brain responsible for emotional self-regulation appears to be short-circuited. These
scientific findings concerning how the brain may malfunction raise questions about our
understanding of human behaviour. And they pose a challenge to our fundamental assumptions
about education, law and some current child-rearing practices.
Researchers have identified the orbitofrontal cortex as the cerebral area where
dysfunction is likely to be located in individuals subject to hostile outbursts and
aggression. The orbitofrontal cortex is part of the prefrontal cortex, the area of grey
matter most involved in social intelligence, impulse control, and attention. So-named
because of its proximity to the eye socket, or orbit, the orbitofrontal cortex is more
developed in the right hemisphere, the side of the brain that dominates our emotional
functioning. This crucial portion of grey matter appears to have the responsibility of
evaluating and regulating emotional impulses, such as fear and rage, generated in the
lower brain centres.
Whenever people exhibit impulsive outbursts of emotion accompanied by failures of
behavioural self-control, we're likely witnessing short-circuiting of the wiring of the
orbitofrontal cortex. Such short-circuiting occurs not only during episodes of overt
violence, but also during everyday failures of self-regulation, be it episodes of road
rage, or in children throwing temper tantrums on the playground, or in parents
"losing it" and screaming at their children.
We tend to view the cortex as the "thinking" part of the brain, and therefore
as the initiator of human activity. In reality, one of its most important functions is
inhibition.
"The cortex's job is to prevent the inappropriate response, rather than to produce
the appropriate one," psychologist and neuroscientist Joseph LeDoux has written.
Impulsive outbursts of aggression do not necessarily result from a conscious decision by
an individual to do something violent. Instead, there may be a failure on the part of the
orbitofrontal cortex to dampen a hostile urge originating in structures deep down in the
brain that function well below the level of consciousness. By the time the person becomes
aware of the impulse to act, he may have already committed the deed.
As we come to understand the neurophysiological substrate of human behaviours, we
should be less inclined to judge and condemn our fellow human beings, and more interested
in inquiry into how precisely the brain develops the capacity for self-regulation.
What can interfere with the wiring of the orbitofrontal cortex? Injury to the brain may
be at fault, as was the case in some of the subjects reviewed in the Science article.
Genetic predisposing factors may also contribute in some cases. However, the commonest
source of disruption to the circuitry of self-regulation is neither physical trauma nor
heredity, but the absence of the conditions required for proper development.
There is now a large body of evidence suggesting that the infant's emotional
interactions with its primary caregivers provide the major influence on the physiological
and biochemical development of the brain regions responsible for emotional and behavioural
self-control. When infants and young children lack parenting, which is emotionally
nurturing and consistently available, given in a non-stressed atmosphere, research
suggests that problems of self-regulation often result. The greater the deprivation, the
less optimally the orbitofrontal cortex is likely to develop and function, and the greater
the predictable difficulties in self-regulation.
Children's future brain functioning depends on fully attentive and emotionally
consistent parenting during the early years. Were we to fully grasp that fact, current
social policies would surely change to support parents in that essential task -- rather
than, as is now the case, forcing many families to place economic goals above the needs of
child-rearing.
Evidence is that the self-regulating parts of the brain can develop throughout the life
cycle, depending on the appropriate input from the environment. Were schoolteachers and
administrators to understand the relationship between brain development and behaviour,
they would be less punitive in their approach to children with self-regulation problems,
more likely to ask themselves what empathic approaches could help such children develop
the brain circuits and psychological capacities needed for self-control.
And while the legal system could not excuse violent behaviours based on what PET
(positron emission tomography) scans may reveal about the brain, the law could show much
more understanding toward human beings whose early lives did not allow for the optimal
development of brain structures needed for self-regulation.
There's little doubt that a significant percentage of prison inhabitants have various
disorders of self-regulation. Little doubt, too, that prison conditions are virtually
designed to exacerbate such mental and physiological brain dysfunctions, rather than to
help people gain mastery over them.
Gabor Maté, a Vancouver physician, is the author of Scattered
Minds: A New Look at the Origins and Healing of Attention Deficit Disorder. |